Rosalie Dann, Tauranga New Zealand It seems that most people appear to be relying on what they have traditionally believed or what they have heard. The eye of the needle is in fact not only narrow, but only tall enough for a human to get through. Thus, a camel would not only have to unload the baggage, but come through the gate on it's knees.
Thus, in order for a rich man to be saved, not only must he unload his possessions, but he must also kneel before God. This is consistent with Christ's response to the rich man in directing him to give away his possessions and follow Him.
Eye Of The Needle Via Feratta - Zion Adventure Company - ZION ADVENTURE COMPANY
Both are necessary. Mike, Chicago U. I think we should not allow this to become a battle that is not worth the potential casualties it can produce. Whatever the facts about the actual terms "camel" and "eye of a needle", we can clearly surmise that Jesus intends that we know that, if a rich man enters the "Kingdom of God," it will be with extreme difficulty. It should also be pointed out that, because of God's mercy, He cleverly provides a message of hope by the carefully crafted way in which the worded the proclamation.
In it, we can deduce that even though it will be difficult for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven, because of his lust for worldly possessions and monetary wealth, it is possible that man can escape the inevitable consequence of greed by renouncing money as it becomes his god and accepting Christ in its place which in actuality is the challenge.
None the less, I am convinced that this passage of scripture does not insist that a rich man absolutely cannot enter the kingdom of God. I discovered a commentator scholar working on a bible can't remember which one but it was around 10th century. This commentator spoke about the meaning of this passage to friends who had travelled to Egypt. They recalled seeing a gate in Egypt called the eye of the needle and stated maybe Jerusalam had a gate like this as well.
The commentator put it in the bible as a footnote reference and as time went on it took off. Logically the needle gate makes sense, did it exist, who knows because there is so much information for and against, is there any way to prove either side, I doubt it. Tim Reimer, Steinbach Canada Since Jesus spoke these words, there should be no debate as to a gate named "the eye of the needle".
Jesus himself says it existed, so we know that it did. This parable is not about wealth and rich people. It is about reverence and belief in God. In order for the camel to pass this gate, the camel would have to go down on its knees; it could not be laden with worldly goods. This does not mean that rich people can't go to heaven; it means that all men who humble themselves to God can. William Tarn, San Angelo, Texas There is no reliable source that discusses there being any gate called the eye of the needle.
That was due to a single 9th century source. It says what it means regardless of how uncomfortable that may be for the rich. Use your wealth to care for the poor.
eye of a needle
The rich man asked Jesus what he must do to enter Heaven and was referred to God's commandments. His answer was "All these things have I observed from my youth up. Remember that Jesus said elsewhere that "all the law and the prophets" hang on our love for God and man. Only God can give us this love, therefore it is impossible for man to keep the law without God's love dwelling in him!
We must die to self "take up the cross", Mark and selfishness in order to live in Christ and His love. Christ's love will compel us to share what we have with those who have not, which is "pure religion and undefiled"! James Randy, Texas USA Personally I think Jesus meant that if a rich man who carried himself like His primary subject came to Him, it would be completely impossible for him to enter the kingdom of heaven.
Movies in Theaters
And the apparatus he used was to provoke us to see the point, so if the needle gate exists, well and good, if it doesn't, no problems, still the primary meaning won't be lost. Vincent Ouma, Mombasa, Kenya In the Jewish culture it was not uncommon for people to speak using "word pictures. It makes more sense that Jesus was saying that in order to please YHWH one would have to choose obedience and life over worldly goods than that it is impossible to please HIM if one is wealthy.
As mentioned by others previously, Jesus had many wealthy followers, and was also "ministered to by women of substance. The concept of a physical "Eye of the Needle Gate" seems more consistent with His message as a whole than the "impossible" reasoning. USA It's fun to watch rich Christians dance around this passage while defending their wealth.
The number of rumours they come up with about gates and mountain passages A rich man cannot enter heaven, because his riches could have been used to save people from famine, illness or any other number of ailments. But it hasn't. That money could still do a whole lot of Christian good, but it won't. It will fund Bill's lifestyle. Now to you and me, that's fair enough. He's earned that money. It's his to do with a he pleases.
I remember a parable, not sure if it's in the Bible. A rich man donated half his wealth to a charity, and a poor man donated everything he had. The poor man's belongings made much less of an impact than the rich man's, but the poor man was blessed. Liam Pentland, Durham UK Jews created a religious system whereby people were required to pay the priests for sacrifices at the alter. Rich people were virtually guaranteed Heaven because they could buy their way in. Jesus knew the heart of the rich man and saw his pride in his obedience to the false law system created by Jews.
I believe he was telling the rich man that his God was his wealth but he was also telling his disciples that no one can buy their way into heaven. I think he meant to illustrate the impossibility of that fact by using the impossibility of a literal camel passing through the eye of a literal needle.
I don't think the passage has anything to do with having money. It's about Jesus proclaiming there is but one way to heaven and God provided it through His Son With the Father, all things are possible. When his disciples asked how anyone could be then saved, they were asking from the basis of their understanding of the religious system they knew.
Jesus was saying that if you follow the law and the system, you must then be perfect in it. And it's not only the rich holding on to his or possessions. It could be relationship, work, time or any things shift your focus from eternal things or things of God. Eye of the Needle Walk. Review Highlights. Reviewed February 5, Reviewed December 30, Review of Eye of the Needle Walk. Date of experience: September Ask j0harvey about Eye of the Needle Walk.
See all 14 reviews. Reviews Write a review. Filter reviews.
Traveler rating. Excellent Very good 4. Average 0. Poor 0. Terrible 0. Traveler type. The narrative focuses on four people - a German spy, a British MI governor, and an English couple - the couple is told through a single POV, but it left me with the feeling that the only fully fleshed character is "the Needle". I absolutely love when a strong female character is incorporated in a story.
Ready for your next read?
Not sure! In the last 50 pages, Lucy really becomes a war hero and I see a whole different side to her, but overall she shares that 70's perception that women are defined by their sexuality. I suppose if it had been written today it would have been thought out the way she, in particular, was written eventually. Anyway, sometimes I have a tendency to analyze things more, so View all 4 comments.
Jul 01, Lewis Weinstein rated it it was amazing Shelves: research-reviews , a-research , fiction-historical. Among the best thrillers ever. My comments about Follett's approach to the actual history in his historical novel "Eye of the Needle" can be found in my author blog Follett starts with a one page historical preface about the D-Day deception. What follows is fiction. Still and all, one suspects something like this must have happened. Follett successfully creates tension about an event where we know the actual outcome, ie that Faber cannot succeed.
This result is much like that achieved by Forsythe in "Day of the Jackal" published in the early s, before "Eye of the Needle" , where we know that De Gaulle was not murdered by a sniper but are carried into great tension anyway.